<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reaching out for some link love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2008/04/reaching-out-for-some-link-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2008/04/reaching-out-for-some-link-love/</link>
	<description> Bill Sebald - SEO and Social Media Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 02:31:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenny</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2008/04/reaching-out-for-some-link-love/comment-page-1/#comment-2887</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 01:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2887</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s up, just wanted to mention, I loved this blog post. It was inspiring. Keep on posting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s up, just wanted to mention, I loved this blog post. It was inspiring. Keep on posting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2008/04/reaching-out-for-some-link-love/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=3#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I think it can make sense in certain scenarios.  But if you&#039;re using triangle linking to hide reciprocal linking from a search engine, the good ones are already all over it.  It may still be slightly better regarding passing link equity, but remember, reciprocal linking isn&#039;t inherently evil, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it can make sense in certain scenarios.  But if you&#8217;re using triangle linking to hide reciprocal linking from a search engine, the good ones are already all over it.  It may still be slightly better regarding passing link equity, but remember, reciprocal linking isn&#8217;t inherently evil, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Stanwick</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2008/04/reaching-out-for-some-link-love/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Stanwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=3#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be curious of your thoughts on triangle linking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be curious of your thoughts on triangle linking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

