<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Reads Javascript &#8211; Yahoo and Bing, not so much.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/02/google-and-javascript/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/02/google-and-javascript/</link>
	<description> Bill Sebald - SEO and Social Media Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 02:31:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Sebald</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/02/google-and-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-1931</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Sebald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 02:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=168#comment-1931</guid>
		<description>@Roberto - I didn&#039;t test for that, but from what I&#039;ve read, my understanding is no, Google is not likely to follow that.  

If you&#039;re trying to hide links or content from Google, maybe to speed load time, or hide affiliate links (if you&#039;re in the camp that thinks Google may devalue sites with a lot of affiliate links), then I guess you could try that route.  

The point of this article was to say that standard Javascript implementations (for a navigation perhaps) that many SEOs still freak out about, may not be worth the &quot;freak out&quot; anymore.  But you raise a good question here.  I would imagine Google would want to learn to crawl it though, so it can get a better idea of what&#039;s really going on in the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Roberto &#8211; I didn&#8217;t test for that, but from what I&#8217;ve read, my understanding is no, Google is not likely to follow that.  </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re trying to hide links or content from Google, maybe to speed load time, or hide affiliate links (if you&#8217;re in the camp that thinks Google may devalue sites with a lot of affiliate links), then I guess you could try that route.  </p>
<p>The point of this article was to say that standard Javascript implementations (for a navigation perhaps) that many SEOs still freak out about, may not be worth the &#8220;freak out&#8221; anymore.  But you raise a good question here.  I would imagine Google would want to learn to crawl it though, so it can get a better idea of what&#8217;s really going on in the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/02/google-and-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 18:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=168#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>Interesting. But what about links inside a javascript code?
Let&#039;s say I have this code on my web page:

script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://script.js&quot;&gt; 

and in script.js I have this:

document.write(&#039;a href=http://www.myblog.com/&gt;super keyword&lt;/a&gt;&#039;);

Will Google be able to *read* this link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. But what about links inside a javascript code?<br />
Let&#8217;s say I have this code on my web page:</p>
<p>script type=&#8221;text/javascript&#8221; src=&#8221;http://script.js&#8221;&gt; </p>
<p>and in script.js I have this:</p>
<p>document.write(&#8216;a href=http://www.myblog.com/&gt;super keyword&#8216;);</p>
<p>Will Google be able to *read* this link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Tips Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/02/google-and-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-1525</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Tips Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 11:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=168#comment-1525</guid>
		<description>Interesting read.  I guess thats why Google is number 1 eh?  I notice for my sites that Google always has so many more pages indexed than Yahoo and Bing.  I guess Google will be top dawg for a little while longer.
.-= SEO Tips Forum&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.favormob.com/getting-your-site-out-there/345-creating-backlinks-its-importance-search-engine-optimization.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Creating Backlinks and its importance in Search Engine Optimization&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read.  I guess thats why Google is number 1 eh?  I notice for my sites that Google always has so many more pages indexed than Yahoo and Bing.  I guess Google will be top dawg for a little while longer.<br />
.-= SEO Tips Forum&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://www.favormob.com/getting-your-site-out-there/345-creating-backlinks-its-importance-search-engine-optimization.html">Creating Backlinks and its importance in Search Engine Optimization</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Sebald</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/02/google-and-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-1493</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Sebald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=168#comment-1493</guid>
		<description>No tool.  Just searched each nonsense term in quotes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No tool.  Just searched each nonsense term in quotes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark gupta</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/02/google-and-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-1489</link>
		<dc:creator>mark gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=168#comment-1489</guid>
		<description>I was wondering what tool you used to access weather or not Google and the other engines indexed the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering what tool you used to access weather or not Google and the other engines indexed the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Singer</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/02/google-and-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-1415</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=168#comment-1415</guid>
		<description>This is a great test. I&#039;ve actually been wondering about this lately because I was noticing that navigations that used onclicks to control spiders didn&#039;t appear to be influencing the Google spiders.  So much for my short cut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great test. I&#8217;ve actually been wondering about this lately because I was noticing that navigations that used onclicks to control spiders didn&#8217;t appear to be influencing the Google spiders.  So much for my short cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Sebald</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/02/google-and-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-1407</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Sebald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=168#comment-1407</guid>
		<description>It would make sense for a sophisticated algorithm to want to follow links even if they&#039;re not properly coded (ie, plain old text with http://).  Interesting thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would make sense for a sophisticated algorithm to want to follow links even if they&#8217;re not properly coded (ie, plain old text with <a href="http://">http://</a>).  Interesting thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Nau</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/02/google-and-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-1403</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Nau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=168#comment-1403</guid>
		<description>Bill - I tend to believe that the Google crawls any http:// link (even just plain old text). Interesting that Yahoo and Bing can not determine that there is a link buried in the JS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill &#8211; I tend to believe that the Google crawls any http:// link (even just plain old text). Interesting that Yahoo and Bing can not determine that there is a link buried in the JS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

