<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speed Is A Ranking Factor, But Don’t Hit The Gas Yet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/05/speed-is-a-ranking-factor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/05/speed-is-a-ranking-factor/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:57:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website maker</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/05/speed-is-a-ranking-factor/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Website maker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=191#comment-139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Matt Cutts pointed out pretty well the way speed was going to be used as a SER tool. The gist of it was that it was just one of hundreds of factors to be considered, and that it&#039;s real impact was only on determining priority for any two (or more) search results which were identical for all other ranking factors. He made it very clear that in no way was the big G going to weight speed as a critical ranking element, instead only using it to filter very similar results.
.-= Website maker&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.doomby.com/blog,new-free-website-maker-more-magic-and-features-with-extra-pretty,295028.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New free website maker More magic and features With extra pretty&lt;/a&gt; =-.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Matt Cutts pointed out pretty well the way speed was going to be used as a SER tool. The gist of it was that it was just one of hundreds of factors to be considered, and that it&#8217;s real impact was only on determining priority for any two (or more) search results which were identical for all other ranking factors. He made it very clear that in no way was the big G going to weight speed as a critical ranking element, instead only using it to filter very similar results.<br />
.-= Website maker&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://blog.doomby.com/blog,new-free-website-maker-more-magic-and-features-with-extra-pretty,295028.html">New free website maker More magic and features With extra pretty</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website maker</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/05/speed-is-a-ranking-factor/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Website maker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=191#comment-673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Matt Cutts pointed out pretty well the way speed was going to be used as a SER tool. The gist of it was that it was just one of hundreds of factors to be considered, and that it&#039;s real impact was only on determining priority for any two (or more) search results which were identical for all other ranking factors. He made it very clear that in no way was the big G going to weight speed as a critical ranking element, instead only using it to filter very similar results.
.-= Website maker&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.doomby.com/blog,new-free-website-maker-more-magic-and-features-with-extra-pretty,295028.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New free website maker More magic and features With extra pretty&lt;/a&gt; =-.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Matt Cutts pointed out pretty well the way speed was going to be used as a SER tool. The gist of it was that it was just one of hundreds of factors to be considered, and that it&#8217;s real impact was only on determining priority for any two (or more) search results which were identical for all other ranking factors. He made it very clear that in no way was the big G going to weight speed as a critical ranking element, instead only using it to filter very similar results.<br />
.-= Website maker&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://blog.doomby.com/blog,new-free-website-maker-more-magic-and-features-with-extra-pretty,295028.html">New free website maker More magic and features With extra pretty</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logan</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/05/speed-is-a-ranking-factor/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=191#comment-138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always thought that site speed is good for site traffic enhancement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought that site speed is good for site traffic enhancement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logan</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/05/speed-is-a-ranking-factor/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=191#comment-672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always thought that site speed is good for site traffic enhancement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought that site speed is good for site traffic enhancement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/05/speed-is-a-ranking-factor/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=191#comment-137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very nice blog!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice blog!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/05/speed-is-a-ranking-factor/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=191#comment-671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very nice blog!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice blog!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim McLearen</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/05/speed-is-a-ranking-factor/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim McLearen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=191#comment-136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed.  Bad HTML isn&#039;t the issue.  I used to fight against it and claim it, but it&#039;s just not it.  It&#039;s redirects.  It&#039;s all the different calls. It&#039;s backend developmental issues.  Most sites don&#039;t have such backends.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  Bad HTML isn&#8217;t the issue.  I used to fight against it and claim it, but it&#8217;s just not it.  It&#8217;s redirects.  It&#8217;s all the different calls. It&#8217;s backend developmental issues.  Most sites don&#8217;t have such backends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim McLearen</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/05/speed-is-a-ranking-factor/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim McLearen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=191#comment-670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed.  Bad HTML isn&#039;t the issue.  I used to fight against it and claim it, but it&#039;s just not it.  It&#039;s redirects.  It&#039;s all the different calls. It&#039;s backend developmental issues.  Most sites don&#039;t have such backends.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  Bad HTML isn&#8217;t the issue.  I used to fight against it and claim it, but it&#8217;s just not it.  It&#8217;s redirects.  It&#8217;s all the different calls. It&#8217;s backend developmental issues.  Most sites don&#8217;t have such backends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Louella</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/05/speed-is-a-ranking-factor/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Louella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 13:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=191#comment-135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You need to look at speed as a usability issue. Your customers want speed and study&#039;s have shown that even 500ms slow can make up to 20% less conversions. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to look at speed as a usability issue. Your customers want speed and study&#8217;s have shown that even 500ms slow can make up to 20% less conversions. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Louella</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2010/05/speed-is-a-ranking-factor/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Louella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 13:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=191#comment-669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You need to look at speed as a usability issue. Your customers want speed and study&#039;s have shown that even 500ms slow can make up to 20% less conversions. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to look at speed as a usability issue. Your customers want speed and study&#8217;s have shown that even 500ms slow can make up to 20% less conversions. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
