<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Think Google Will Reverse (Some Of) Penguin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2012/05/i-think-google-will-reverse-penguin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2012/05/i-think-google-will-reverse-penguin/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:57:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathie</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2012/05/i-think-google-will-reverse-penguin/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=880#comment-301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems to me that Google is taking aim at its own currency: backlinks.  No matter how great their content is, small local businesses will not get many backlinks... who really is going to link to them?  Even if they can afford to make their sites amazing and chock-ful of fascinating content,  they are too small to get much notice or many links.  

So if these small businesses are not allowed to build offsite backlinks to their sites or are penalized for doing so, they will disappear from search results, and no one will be able to find them. Thus the depth and breadth of search results will be diminished and Google itself will have poorer results. Companies who provide great services but who are bad at writing and putting content on their sites will not be found.  Only larger businesses who can afford a ton of content writers will be high in the results.  

Already it seems harder to find things that were easy to find before Penguin, and Google search results seem in a bit of a mess now.  I found myself searching with Yahoo the other day, trying to find a local company whose name I couldn&#039;t remember.  It&#039;s been years and years since I searched with Yahoo.  But there was the company I needed in Yahoo&#039;s results and they were no where to be found in Google.  They must have been lost in the Penguin update.  So Penguin has already hurt Google if people have to turn to Yahoo to find what they need.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that Google is taking aim at its own currency: backlinks.  No matter how great their content is, small local businesses will not get many backlinks&#8230; who really is going to link to them?  Even if they can afford to make their sites amazing and chock-ful of fascinating content,  they are too small to get much notice or many links.  </p>
<p>So if these small businesses are not allowed to build offsite backlinks to their sites or are penalized for doing so, they will disappear from search results, and no one will be able to find them. Thus the depth and breadth of search results will be diminished and Google itself will have poorer results. Companies who provide great services but who are bad at writing and putting content on their sites will not be found.  Only larger businesses who can afford a ton of content writers will be high in the results.  </p>
<p>Already it seems harder to find things that were easy to find before Penguin, and Google search results seem in a bit of a mess now.  I found myself searching with Yahoo the other day, trying to find a local company whose name I couldn&#8217;t remember.  It&#8217;s been years and years since I searched with Yahoo.  But there was the company I needed in Yahoo&#8217;s results and they were no where to be found in Google.  They must have been lost in the Penguin update.  So Penguin has already hurt Google if people have to turn to Yahoo to find what they need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathie</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2012/05/i-think-google-will-reverse-penguin/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=880#comment-836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems to me that Google is taking aim at its own currency: backlinks.  No matter how great their content is, small local businesses will not get many backlinks... who really is going to link to them?  Even if they can afford to make their sites amazing and chock-ful of fascinating content,  they are too small to get much notice or many links.  

So if these small businesses are not allowed to build offsite backlinks to their sites or are penalized for doing so, they will disappear from search results, and no one will be able to find them. Thus the depth and breadth of search results will be diminished and Google itself will have poorer results. Companies who provide great services but who are bad at writing and putting content on their sites will not be found.  Only larger businesses who can afford a ton of content writers will be high in the results.  

Already it seems harder to find things that were easy to find before Penguin, and Google search results seem in a bit of a mess now.  I found myself searching with Yahoo the other day, trying to find a local company whose name I couldn&#039;t remember.  It&#039;s been years and years since I searched with Yahoo.  But there was the company I needed in Yahoo&#039;s results and they were no where to be found in Google.  They must have been lost in the Penguin update.  So Penguin has already hurt Google if people have to turn to Yahoo to find what they need.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that Google is taking aim at its own currency: backlinks.  No matter how great their content is, small local businesses will not get many backlinks&#8230; who really is going to link to them?  Even if they can afford to make their sites amazing and chock-ful of fascinating content,  they are too small to get much notice or many links.  </p>
<p>So if these small businesses are not allowed to build offsite backlinks to their sites or are penalized for doing so, they will disappear from search results, and no one will be able to find them. Thus the depth and breadth of search results will be diminished and Google itself will have poorer results. Companies who provide great services but who are bad at writing and putting content on their sites will not be found.  Only larger businesses who can afford a ton of content writers will be high in the results.  </p>
<p>Already it seems harder to find things that were easy to find before Penguin, and Google search results seem in a bit of a mess now.  I found myself searching with Yahoo the other day, trying to find a local company whose name I couldn&#8217;t remember.  It&#8217;s been years and years since I searched with Yahoo.  But there was the company I needed in Yahoo&#8217;s results and they were no where to be found in Google.  They must have been lost in the Penguin update.  So Penguin has already hurt Google if people have to turn to Yahoo to find what they need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Brewer</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2012/05/i-think-google-will-reverse-penguin/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Brewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=880#comment-300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe you might have missed the point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe you might have missed the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Brewer</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2012/05/i-think-google-will-reverse-penguin/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Brewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=880#comment-835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe you might have missed the point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe you might have missed the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2012/05/i-think-google-will-reverse-penguin/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=880#comment-299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s funny, everyone&#039;s going nuts about Penguin and I&#039;ve seen nothing in rankings or traffic reports to be concerned about, over 20-30 clients, whatsoever.

Sometimes I wonder if I&#039;m missing the point altogether.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny, everyone&#8217;s going nuts about Penguin and I&#8217;ve seen nothing in rankings or traffic reports to be concerned about, over 20-30 clients, whatsoever.</p>
<p>Sometimes I wonder if I&#8217;m missing the point altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2012/05/i-think-google-will-reverse-penguin/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=880#comment-834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s funny, everyone&#039;s going nuts about Penguin and I&#039;ve seen nothing in rankings or traffic reports to be concerned about, over 20-30 clients, whatsoever.

Sometimes I wonder if I&#039;m missing the point altogether.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny, everyone&#8217;s going nuts about Penguin and I&#8217;ve seen nothing in rankings or traffic reports to be concerned about, over 20-30 clients, whatsoever.</p>
<p>Sometimes I wonder if I&#8217;m missing the point altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @billsebald</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2012/05/i-think-google-will-reverse-penguin/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>@billsebald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=880#comment-298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m never coming back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m never coming back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @billsebald</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2012/05/i-think-google-will-reverse-penguin/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>@billsebald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=880#comment-833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m never coming back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m never coming back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2012/05/i-think-google-will-reverse-penguin/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=880#comment-297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether or not they know the algorithm fully or not,  I&#039;m yet to see any massive change in SERPs for our clients.  Which is great so far...  means we&#039;re doing a good job.

It&#039;s quite an issue for Google to be faced with coming up with a solution to people &#039;manipulating&#039; page rank.  Things have been this way out of necessity.  However,  I bet if you asked Google to define what is relevant for a search term, they&#039;d have a tough time doing it.

Considering things like context and what constitutes positive or negative opinions would be a really tough ask.

It&#039;s the best search engine we&#039;ve got.  I&#039;m grateful.  Me and 97% of other Australians (apparently) seem to think so too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether or not they know the algorithm fully or not,  I&#8217;m yet to see any massive change in SERPs for our clients.  Which is great so far&#8230;  means we&#8217;re doing a good job.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s quite an issue for Google to be faced with coming up with a solution to people &#8216;manipulating&#8217; page rank.  Things have been this way out of necessity.  However,  I bet if you asked Google to define what is relevant for a search term, they&#8217;d have a tough time doing it.</p>
<p>Considering things like context and what constitutes positive or negative opinions would be a really tough ask.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the best search engine we&#8217;ve got.  I&#8217;m grateful.  Me and 97% of other Australians (apparently) seem to think so too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.greenlaneseo.com/blog/2012/05/i-think-google-will-reverse-penguin/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlaneseo.com/blog/?p=880#comment-832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether or not they know the algorithm fully or not,  I&#039;m yet to see any massive change in SERPs for our clients.  Which is great so far...  means we&#039;re doing a good job.

It&#039;s quite an issue for Google to be faced with coming up with a solution to people &#039;manipulating&#039; page rank.  Things have been this way out of necessity.  However,  I bet if you asked Google to define what is relevant for a search term, they&#039;d have a tough time doing it.

Considering things like context and what constitutes positive or negative opinions would be a really tough ask.

It&#039;s the best search engine we&#039;ve got.  I&#039;m grateful.  Me and 97% of other Australians (apparently) seem to think so too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether or not they know the algorithm fully or not,  I&#8217;m yet to see any massive change in SERPs for our clients.  Which is great so far&#8230;  means we&#8217;re doing a good job.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s quite an issue for Google to be faced with coming up with a solution to people &#8216;manipulating&#8217; page rank.  Things have been this way out of necessity.  However,  I bet if you asked Google to define what is relevant for a search term, they&#8217;d have a tough time doing it.</p>
<p>Considering things like context and what constitutes positive or negative opinions would be a really tough ask.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the best search engine we&#8217;ve got.  I&#8217;m grateful.  Me and 97% of other Australians (apparently) seem to think so too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
