Social Media Optimization Category

Has The Fuse Been Lit For A Vertical and Social Search Explosion?

July 25th, 2008 by Bill in SEO, Social Media Optimization

“The search landscape is evolving” - sure, we hear that everyday in this industry, but when you log on to Google, it’s hard to drink the Kool-Aid.  I have to admit, I think I’m finally starting to feel the “hype” thanks to some inspiriting things from the Yahoo camp.  When Yahoo said they were going to “Open Up”, I didn’t think they’d kick the barn doors open this wide, this fast.  This is exciting.  On the heels of SearchMonkey, Yahoo recently announced BOSS, another component of their “Y!OS”, or Yahoo Open Strategy.   I think vertical / social engines are finally going to get their 15 minutes, and I couldn’t be happier.

From Yahoo: BOSS (Build your Own Search Service) is Yahoo!’s open search web services platform. The goal of BOSS is simple: to foster innovation in the search industry. Developers, start-ups, and large Internet companies can use BOSS to build and launch web-scale search products that utilize the entire Yahoo! Search index. BOSS gives you access to Yahoo!’s investments in crawling and indexing, ranking and relevancy algorithms, and powerful infrastructure. By combining your unique assets and ideas with our search technology assets, BOSS is a platform for the next generation of search innovation, serving hundreds of millions of users across the Web.

BOSS is an effort to update the model, and develop a stronger footing in search.  If you think about it, search engine progress has been slow lately, especially compared to the evolution of the rest of the web.  The best way to make fast, impactful headway is to peel away from horizontal search, and test out new Web 2.0 breeds of vertical search products.  Traditionally, there have been heavy risks and costs associated with this kind of venture.  With BOSS, hopefully the tides can turn, and a plethora of attempts that weren’t previously possible based on these concerns, may suddenly ascend.  Sure, there will be casualties, but it’s much less likely to be Yahoo if they’re the backbone to all these ventures.  Yahoo is probably thinking, “If we can’t beat them, we can be their engine.”

With social computing slated to reach everything from cell phone platforms, webmail accounts, video game consoles, and desktop applications, it’s logical that it will hit search in a big way.  The ball is rolling – the new engine Me.dium is a social search engine running off BOSS, and is ultimately supposed to be a crowd-controlled engine.  Does that mean the noble intention of a human-maintained engine like Mahalo can be improved with social search?  I would think so.  I’m already pretty happy with the vertical search in my favorite social networks – I’m finding myself checking properties like Answers.com, LinkedIn, Technorati, StumbleUpon, and Mixx before hitting Google when I know the kind of results I’m looking for (which is most the time).

If there’s one truism about the web, it’s that things move incredibly fast.  A site like eBay was nothing as a start-up in 1995, and a household name in 1998 – in web years, that’s incredibly fast, especially considering that was more than 10 years ago.  The novelty of bidding, and the value of discounts, feedback, and communication ultimately made the spirit of purchasing online seem less like a fad.  Granted, there was still a lot of fear about fraud and security then, but once those safety concerns started to quell (mainly in part to eBay’s efforts, Paypal, and users’ word of mouth), millions of people were at least semi-consciously accepting online ecommerce across the board.  All ecommerce, from Amazon to shopping verticals/engines, were benefactors from this new phenomenon.   The web is always accepting of the next big cultural influencer, and is usually poked by the last big sensation - in this case (as of 2008), social networks.  History suggests it is going to happen fast, and sudden.  In today’s web-world, a 10 year span is a 1-2 year span; or, a blink of an eye to a busy human-being.

So what if horizontal search continues to fall behind, and vertical / social hybrids become household names?  What does this mean for search marketing?  Well, it certainly suggests marketers will have to be on their toes, but this should still offer many new branding and ROI opportunities if leveraged correctly.   It will most certainly lead to a higher likelihood of targeted, converting traffic.   That’s a huge benefit.  Your pre-qualified visitors will be even more qualified.  SEO 2.0 will likely become the norm, and leave the beta stage it’s in now.  The idea of marrying SEO and communities may seem difficult, but it simply requires more marketing and visitor understanding than traditional SEO provides.  SEO will simply have to morph in tandem with the search engines, and leave behind some of the general exposure tactics.  Not only will a vertical and social affect the actions of your users, but it will likely start to play a more important role to your CPC quality scores, too, as visitors will start to become accustomed to improved results and search experience.  Some research firms think vertical search might draw a billion dollars in revenue by the end of 2009; hundreds of new engines are already popping up without the help of BOSS now, but this may grow exponentially making these huge profits a real possible.

It’s an exciting time to be on the web.  It will be great to see what hands the other search properties are holding.  Last week Google showed their hand with their testing of social computing in their platform.  This is just the beginning of something very, very cool.


Return of the son of the “Google Buying Digg” rumor mill

July 25th, 2008 by Bill in SEO, Social Media Optimization

So there’s noise that Google’s going to buy Digg.  Is this breaking news?  Not really, unless you consider “breaking news” anything as old as March.  But the rumor part seems to be becoming less of a rumor according to TechCrunch .  A few days ago, news about a signed letter of intent started to circulate:  Google will aquire for $200 million-ish .  Like most engines, acquiring is part of Google’s big plan.  Monetizing these services with ads typically follows.  With Digg, this might be the biggest purchase yet in terms of mindshare (the previous winner being YouTube, but this was a bit befor YouTube was the bohemeth it is now).  Google bought Picasa, Blogger, Writely, and several others.

Digg uses Microsoft now for ads.  I’m not sure if they’re still using Federated Media in conjunction.  Obviously, MSN gets pushed out of the plan when Google steps in.  Plus, Google will likely start importing its other products and technology into Digg.  My question is, on the heels of my last post about Google’s social interface (that’s now testing), how much of Digg will go into Google’s search engine?  Is there technology that Google can leverage, or is it just simpler for Google’s engineers to develop it themsleves than shape to fit?  Maybe the Digg brand is the real driver.  When you think of social in any sense, you think of Digg (definitely not Orkut).

I think it all sounds pretty, well, normal, but I hate to see the purity of Digg disappear.  It’s a little like a big business swallowing up a pioneer, like record labels did with the Sex Pistols, or Wawa did with my favorite corner store.  No matter what good comes from the big, new, shiny neighbors, some of the charm is gone in this independent social-space neighborhood.

A little bittersweet for me, I guess.


Image from web connoisseur.com


New Google Interface Popping Up All Over

July 18th, 2008 by Bill in SEO, Social Media Optimization

A couple people in the agency were blessed by Google today.  They got to try out a new social-driven interface.

This could be huge.

We knew Google was coming with something like this.  Once you’re logged in with a google account, you’ll have the options to remove listings you don’t like, change the orders, voting, add comments, and more.  PLUS - there’s a link that you can see how OTHER people organized the search for themselves.  Sound like tags.

Will the voting affect the natural search?  I have to think it might… since Google always says they’re about recommendation signals.  But would a thumb’s down hurt your rankings?

I also have to think that the traditional relevancy will stay very important to Google.  They put too much stock into their algos, and this kind of social search could be gamed.  But looks like the SEO 2.0 philosophy is going to start paying off.

Click here to see the new interface.

Click here to see the social part (a little buggy yet…)

More on TechCrunch.


Choking On The Term “Social Media” too?

July 16th, 2008 by Bill in Social Media Optimization

Here’s a relatively light-hearted post at Stage Two Consulting about what Social Media actually means.  I enjoyed the frustration, because sometimes I feel like I’m the only one who doesn’t see the wildly rampant (and growing) misuse of this term in some of the forums, blogs, etc.  In my case, frustration loves company.  I found the post, and the comments, to be useful… like a support group. 

I think Amanda Vega made a great point in the comments. 


Stop, thief… that’s MY nickname!

April 22nd, 2008 by Bill in SEO, Social Media Optimization

I don’t contribute to the SEO forums like I should. I’m obsessed with the posts, but I don’t tend to comment because of time restraints. When I do post, my nickname is “billse”. I used to go by “billthemountain”, a play on my favorite Frank Zappa song.

Like any super-nerd, I Google myself. I even Google my nick names. To my utter shock (well, not really ’shock’), I discovered another “billthemountain” posting around. To make the story more funky, he’s was active in the SEO forums I would frequent. From the posts it sounds like he’s more of a web designer looking for some optimization tips, a little bit of a beginner, and more polite than me!

Now, I don’t think he’s an impostor. This isn’t identity theft. I think it’s all fun, playful innocence. I’ve always known I wasn’t the only one using the nick - I tried to sign up for several things with it, only to be told ’sorry - this account name is taken’. That’s part of the reason I quickly bailed on it.

But in all candor, it does make me wonder about the signal of ‘reputation’. I don’t mean reputation management per se, but the emerging idea that a person’s reputation or a site’s reputation might heavily affect link equity. I think this makes sense - we know social computing is going to grow to skyscraper levels, and we know that engines are engaged in leveraging the new ‘personality’ these platforms provide. I think this is an arena ripe for improving universal search if algorithms could eventually reign it in.

Could SEO’s be tasked with reputation management for high-profile Facebook users in the future? It would be weird, but I wouldn’t discount it as a future tactic.