SERPs Customized for Philadelphia Metro Area? Thanks, I guess.

Screenshot of Customized Google search
note: image was altered to fit the width of my blog

“Customized for the metro Philly area”, eh?  Interesting, except my actual location this time was outside of Philadelphia, in Reading, Pennsylvania – Berks County, not Philadelphia.  I’m not exactly sure how the geo-tracking works in this case (I’ll have to look into that), but when I checked my IP path, I’m not running through Philly.  Why not choose Harrisburg then?  I’m equally close.

SEO and IP aside, I just started to wonder about whether this was a good idea at all.

I wasn’t logged in.  I wasn’t asking for personalized search.  What if I didn’t want an art program in the Philadelphia area, but rather an art program like Photoshop?  Why would I want a customized “local” search?  Or, what if I was open to any location?  Granted, these results really didn’t seem that customized to Philly this time around, but how far can Google take this?

I’d prefer some parametric buttons that would let me choose customized results to my location, instead of just having it be “on”.

Video Tour Of Google’s Social Search Interface


This is now in full release on Google.  You need to be logged into Google to see it.  It’s called SearchWiki.  Google reps have said that your personal reordering of listings doesn’t affect the natural search at this time.  This is valuable user data though, so I would expect Google to start considering this.  Google doesn’t work as hard as they do to collect user data, only to not eventually use it in their products!  What better product than Google search?  They just need to figure out how to keep it from being artificially manipulated by black-hats and spammers.


A few posts ago I talked about the lucky coworker who got the Google social search beta.  Well, today the Google fairies smiled upon me.  I created a new Google account for a project I was working on, and a webmaster central account, and BOOM… there it was in all its glory.

I quickly downloaded some screen capture software and put together this video.  Sorry, no sound, but I don’t think you’ll really need it to see what this cool Google interface is all about.

Search Engines You Never Knew Existed

As a search engine junkie, I’m always pulling for the little guy with a good idea. I love competition in the marketplace, especially when they introduce some new ideas.

Yahoo and MSN are very concerned about the future of their properties, despite aggressive roadmap announcements. They’re prime targets for a Cuil-type overtaking.  Google may rule, but I wouldn’t be surprised if I break their mindshare (or mind control? Hmm…) more often in the future.  I’ll happily switch to non-traditional search engines or platform engines – that is, if I find them effective. Unique results speak for themselves.

Here’s a few engines I found – few of which I use (I admit).  But maybe the next winner comes from this list.  What do you think? Shopping, meta, social, and vertical engines abound…

(update – unfortunately the majority of these are offline now in 2015)

· blinkx

· boing



· ChaCha

· Clusty (now called Yippy)


· Ditto

· dumbfind

· exalead

· factbites

· fazzle

· Feedster

· FindSounds

· Gigablast

· GoDefy

· goshme

· GoYams

· Grokker

· IceRocket

· KartOO

· Like

· LiveDeal

· liveplasma


· mnemomap

· Mojeek

· nayio

· Octora

· OiHoi Search

· Pagebull

· PlanetSearch


· Quintura

· Releton

· retrevo gamma

· riya

· SearchMe

· SearchTheWeb2

· sidekiq

· Simply Google

· Singing FISH

· Slideshow

· Slifter

· Speegle

· Sphider


· S R C H R

· SurfWax

· Swoogle

· TagJag!


· Trexy

· turboscout




· Web 2.0

· Webaroo


· What to RENT?

· whonu?


· WiseNut

· yoople

· YuFind


· zapmeta

· Zippy


What would you add?

Google, Yahoo now read Flash – so is Progressive Enhancement obsolete?

With the surprise news that Adobe hooked Google and Yahoo up with a special reader for the spiders (which allows the engines to parse the .swf files and index/follow deeper content), does that mean the SEO’s PE special weapon can be abandoned?

I’m still going to stick with it for a while for my SEO blog and my clients’ sites. Google is adopting the reader first, and has technically been lightly reading some flash files already, but anyone who’s been in the game long enough knows that a lot of these properties launch with half-powered products all the time. Their track record isn’t stellar, so why not a ‘better safe than sorry’ approach?   I don’t think I would consider dropping PE until at least a few more months after MSN jumps aboard.  I’m not sure I would cease building products for the PE method (depending on the cost vs. value), and simple on-page coding is so easy – it seems like a no-brainer.

What about the other engines that will never be this advanced?  Do you care about them?  In preperation for vertical and social searching, I think it’s wise to consider what they could become.   I think this news is going to spark a huge influx of flash sites, but I’m thinking this still seems like a bad idea.

Like our posts, case studies, and experience? Think we're a good fit for your company? Contact Us Now