
I’m thrilled. I always said it wouldn’t make sense for search engines – who value editorial linking – to not value tweets. Yeah, there’s a lot of spam, but that holds true for the regular web. Why turn away good links because of the bad?
Well, they don’t.
Search Engine Land (well, Danny Sullivan) posted this great article today. ”Both Google and Bing tell me that who you are as a person on Twitter can impact how well a page does in regular web search. Authoritative people on Twitter lend their authority to pages they tweet.”
I always encouraged people to tweet for link love. Yeah, yeah… I know the links from Twitter are nofollowed, but not always by the tons of Tweet aggregated services; nor are they often nofollowed by the publishers who use your links in their own blog posts. Now, as it turns out, since Google and Bing get their tweets (and links) straight from Twitter’s feed, the nofollow value isn’t transferred. In reality they do have some – not a lot – of PR influence.
But aside from PageRank, which is very much less than what it was years ago, I’m happy to see the authority signal continue it’s growth in Google and Bing – this time in the form of something like a “SocialRank” or “HumanRank” or “AuthorRank” score. Why not just TrustRank?
To quote my colleague Ian, who I ultimately subverted into my way of thinking one beer-fueled night on my soapbox, “Too much of the link graph is in social (and therefore nofollowed) to be ignored.” Well put, sir.
Popularity: 4% [?]









